Zarina Skin Whitening

Getting rid of a limiting belief

If we realize that only a belief we can decide to initiate a process that allows us to remove that conv nzione and perhaps replace it with one that we believe more functional .
should not be afraid to acquire new empowering beliefs and get rid of those limiting. Overcome their limitations and acquire new tools that give us power can only have positive effects on our lives. It will be our reason to suggest such beliefs are an obstacle for us and must be replaced.

If you've always wanted to paint a picture, but since childhood have you believe (or did they get) to be denied for the design, probably have never had the courage to buy a manual of painting. What is engage in something for which you believe to be denied? It 'obvious that in such a situation that prevented you to learn to paint was its belief that limiting.

must learn to give the proper order of things: sometimes we think we are done in a certain way and that we convince ourselves that our way of being can or can not afford to do certain things. In fact, in most of these situations, the case should be reversed with the effect: it is our belief that power or not being able to do something that makes us behave that way (which is consistent with our limiting belief).

But back to the belief on our limited artistic abilities. What happens when you start to believe they can learn to paint? Obviously not paint like Caravaggio few minutes later, but meanwhile you "open your mind in front of a subject to which had been completely closed. If at that time did not take into account the very idea of \u200b\u200ba course of painting, now in doubt (or conviction) to be able to succeed in learning, you might make a different assessment. And this is not a new resource that provides you with your mind, just after changing your belief? But your mind may allow access to other resources: it could gather more information and reworked, it could give you the incentives and the right concentration to succeed in your work, could also give you the strength to persevere in the face of any attempts. Everything she is convinced we can do it . Here you will find new resources to be accessed by changing your beliefs: if I continued to believe that not good at painting you would not have even allowed the time to see if there is a book for "aspiring painters who are considered negative for the painting". ..

But how do you dismantle a belief that limits us? We do this by acting his two fronts: a first approach provides a rational analysis to verify if indeed this is the case as we believe that, in a later act on internal representations associated with our belief: in this case, we find solace in the GNP through the manipulation of submodalities. In fact even if we only rational analysis reconsider our beliefs from a new angle and this is to change the perception we have of it, and then to change our internal representation. Thus, two parallel approaches that are mutually reinforcing.

Take a sheet of paper on which we write our analysis: it is essential write Because this allows us to develop better information and to read the following days.
Write your limiting belief, in the form of affirmation. For example "I am denied for drawing" or "I think I'm unable to form relationships with others" ...

forces that drive us to change a situation are two: or the pain we feel for the condition under which we are or the pleasure they feel when they reach the new condition (more about these issues in a future post).
So let us combine our pain limiting belief, in order to find the strength to deny it. " To this end, let us ask ourselves the following questions and write responses to our paper:

• What will it cost not to get rid of this belief?
• What negative effects in terms of emotional, economic or physical experience could not free me from this belief?

We then need to put some "dynamite stick" in our belief, in order to blow up a few pillar and let it collapse. So let us write down everything that is in disagreement with our belief and that can help us to demolish it. This task can be facilitated by answering the following questions:

• From what follows this my belief? E 'confirmed by personal experience, I was transferred to another person, a parent, the media, the environment in which I live?
• If belief I was transferred by third parties (friends, parents etc..), It suffices to consider that statement also applies to me? Why? It 'should consider the possible person that I transferred the belief as a role model?
• always believe in that statement or I believe it started from a particular moment of my life? If so, why the first did not believe it?
• What makes me feel that this belief is objectively true? I found that the data is actually the case? And if I have, you can assume that data are insufficient to consider this claim as a universal and ever valid in the future?
• There are aspects of my belief that, for separate analysis, impartial and rational, are clearly unrealistic or absurd or strange in some ways?
• There are specific situations or events in the past, in which I completely deny my belief or my belief in which was only partially confirmed? There are situations or events that relate to other people that this belief was debunked?

then writes a list of episodes or scenes that belie your beliefs and try to gather as much information as possible that conflict with your beliefs. They can be personal experiences or that happened to others. It surely there is different because the absolute truth can be counted on the fingers of one hand, and any thing that you believe can be easily refuted.

Now write a conviction potentiating going to replace the previous one. For example, if your limiting belief was " are denied for the design " type " are convinced he can learn to draw " and immediately begins to look feedback to your new empowering beliefs. Be guided by the following questions:

• There are incidents and situations in my past life that can confirm the new empowering beliefs? What are they?
• There are testimonies of others who can confirm what I said? What are they? There
• past situations similar to the new claim that can make me believe that it is actually credible? What are they?

Finally we try to associate the idea of \u200b\u200b delighted to take on the new empowering belief. To this end, write in our sheet all that helpful and pleasant we will bring the new belief. Here are some questions that can guide us:

• useful I accept this new empowering beliefs? What would be gained "by my" this new belief?
• How will my life and what goals I can achieve?

The aim is then to write as much information as possible to "discredit" the old limiting belief and write others to validate the new "empowering belief." It 's like if we were to try to convince ourselves that things are so different. Not is that we are trying to make fun of: is that everything can be interpreted in many different ways and we must just try to make ours the ' interpretation that is more useful .
So, if our limiting belief is " are ugly and I do not have success in love " (and maybe it will be true ...), is also a fact that " around you can see dozens of couples in which there considering how to make one to be with the other . So we will always have the information that allows us to interpret it differently (and more useful) to our every belief. You'll see just

also suggest a little doubt in the old limiting belief to start automatically the whole process. Then the new resources to be accessed and new actions that follow we will obtain results which will further enhance our new empowering beliefs in a kind of virtuous circle that will give us more power.
What we have written should be read with some frequency in the evenings and mornings or two, three or ten times a day ... there is no precise rule. Do it until you will feel that they have actually acquired the new belief, that is, until, by saying aloud the new belief, you will not understand the tone of your voice made her indeed.

Are There Any Models Like Denise Milani

the labyrinth of our beliefs. The cycle of success

how they formed and rooted in many minds the belief that everyone has? The source can be different

• the teachings and educational models that we had at the age child you have transferred a huge amount of belief to all that surrounds us.
• personal experiences make us continually to "convince" (or doubt) about something.
• We convince ourselves of many things just to hearsay: the comparison with others is another important tool for the acquisition of beliefs.
  

We have already talked about limiting beliefs and empowering. In this post I will deepen the conversation at first, since we limit and should therefore be changed. In
beliefs can make different classifications. Some
limiting beliefs are subjective in nature and refer to the qualities and characteristics of the individual who makes her own. Here's an example:

• 'll never be able to play an instrument because they are not brought to the music.
• am a sensitive person and therefore suffer much more.
• I can not start a business or activity in order to sell just because something must be taken and I have never been.
• I can not carry through things, unfortunately, was not always so.
• Since my grandfather and my father had heart problems, then I am destined to suffer the same diseases.
• .....
  

We all have many beliefs about oneself and one's own way of being and it is quite evident that the kind of beliefs listed above could affect the entire existence of an individual.

There are also beliefs to which we attach a universal character, as if they were laws apply to everyone, in every time and everywhere. Here are some examples:

• You can not do things accurately. In life you have to pick a few and do them well.
• People are always ready to take advantage of you and try to exploit you.
• E 'difficult sincere friendship that exists between men and women.
• A person who has already left once, it will be the second time.
• ...

In reality enough even superficial analysis of the experiences of men to understand that they are belief that very few can rise to the level of universality.

There are also views expressed in the form of rules, such as " if this happens then it means that other "

• If you make it clear to your wife that she exists only for you, then sooner or later leave you.
• If you make your money lose true friends and will live only people who want to exploit you.
• You uncompromising with your employees, sooner or later he will take advantage and work so lazy.
• If you give a hand to someone, the next time you ask your arm.
• If your wife asks you a few days of reflection, then it means he has already decided to leave.
• ...

Knowing that you can not help but believe in something (otherwise you would not have the necessary reference points to guide your behavior), you should at least acquire the habit of considering every your conviction as a purely subjective statement , without any sense of universality and timeless validity. Then it would be appropriate to imply a doubt in every belief you've seen until now as an indisputable truth. Even simply assume that things might not be so, that what you believe might not be true, will allow you to see the world in a different perspective , less rigid, more flexible , that allows you to build a more useful size to achieve objectives and that we were giving to serenity. Finally you should learn how to create yourself beliefs compatible with what you get and what you attorney pleasurable sensations.

Sometimes you have some sort of revelation : it is realized in a moment of how we are affected by this enormous set of rules and beliefs that we have created and that weighs on us like a boulder. It 's like seeing a sudden in a maze, where our beliefs are the walls that guide us, which require us to turn left and right, to take this or that passage. These are our beliefs and our values \u200b\u200b(which are even more deep-rooted beliefs) that encourage us to behave in this or that way, to interpret events in one way or another. Until you become aware of what limits us, we have the illusion of living in an open space: it is as if the walls of the maze, although present, were transparent. We have the illusion that we can move at will. But when we take awareness of the limits that we impose our beliefs, we live in a moment of revelation in which the walls of the maze lose their transparency and color take: we will finally realize how we are stuck in that maze of corridors and intersections. We realize how far we have to do unnecessary to go from point A to point B as a result of entanglement that we have to cross streets. But being aware of the labyrinth in which we is also the first step to disassemble and reassemble every wall in a less complicated, more useful and functional. It 's the first step in creating more open and livable spaces.

So right away, as soon as you realize that your belief is forcing you to follow a path and feel they are not completely at ease on down that road, it starts to feed any doubts. Ask yourself: "Things are really or so could be interpreted differently? . Only by learning to interpret things differently and not through the parameters that you use always, gain the flexibility to really think they can do everything you always wanted. Only by removing and rebuilding your beliefs, that is, acquiring new interpretative models, new filters to observe the world, new styles and behaviors you have in hand the key to becoming who you want to be really.

Try to educate your brain right away. So while it finds that your friend would call and did not do so, instead of "persuade" and " is doing so because he is trying to get away ", ask yourself: " you sure that this is so? There is another explanation that I ignore? .
when asked to reconstruct an object that is broken, instead to think that " is not a job for you and that you are not brought to the precision work! ", try asking yourself," but really be so hard to fit this small object? Really are not able to drive my fingers in this simple manual labor? .

Try opening some new hole in your maze, searching for new ways to interpret events, new directions that are not the ones you've already beaten hundreds of times.

The only thing you should be convinced that "everything you are now firmly convinced ... may not be true. "

Free Mario Salieri Full Film

take up the subject on the belief that, as we firmly believe in what determines our actions. We have seen how our minds can even arrive at self-sabotage just to remain consistent with what he believes in strongly.
Each of us has a lot of convictions. What we believe in continuously adjusts our behavior affects our choices, our results conditions.

For example, many men are convinced that " a relationship between man and woman can last long only if the man behaves in a cold and detached and gives the impression of never being completely in love with his girlfriend . The relationship that these men have with the partner is clearly influenced by their belief to try not to be too mushy, not to indulge more than they should, always surround themselves with an aura of mystery. So our behavior and our actions also depend on what we believe.

But belief is necessary to make other important details.

be convinced of something does not mean that what is objectively true . Remember that once were firmly convinced the existence of Santa Claus and you would have got bitten anyone would try to argue otherwise. If you do not remember, try to tell a child that Santa Claus does not exist and watch the reaction: none of us, even in childhood, would you accept to question their beliefs easily. Yet today you have changed your mind about Santa Claus (or at least we hope ...). So take note that what you believe today may not be true and that, on a certain topic, in a day, a month or a years may have an opinion totally different.

There limiting beliefs and empowering beliefs. Limiting beliefs are for us a hazard, adversely affect us and does not allow us to reach the goals we have set ourselves or to satisfy our desires. For example, there are people who would like to see the world in search of many cultural stimuli, but at the same time they believe that travel is dangerous. So on the one hand want to travel, but they have also a belief that limits them. This belief will affect their choices of course and therefore might decide not to travel or to opt for destinations less interesting culturally, but which are considered safer.
Conversely, there are beliefs that give us power : are those beliefs that allow us to field all the resources we have yet to achieve our goals . Obviously, the classification of limiting beliefs and empowering is entirely subjective.

Too many times we decide to make a substantial change in our lives or to set a target without checking whether our beliefs are compatible with the aim that we want to achieve . If you dream of a career in the company acquiring the title of captain, but at the same time we believe that it is not brought to a position of responsibility, clearly that we believe will be a limit.

is not very smart So navigate to a certain direction if we have one or more convictions rowing in the opposite direction: in the name of the "principle of consistency " which follows the mind (and to whom we talked in the past), may come to the situation with resources very limited and this could adversely affect our results.

The "blueprint for success" in the image attached to this post clearly says that report are our beliefs with the actions and the results we achieve.

When we have many strong convictions entering a very high potential: it is as if our mind is "opened" and accedesse to a number of useful resources which do not normally accessed. The potential resources to which we access make us act in a certain way and our actions produce results. The results, whether satisfactory or not, are having an influence on our beliefs, closing the circle.

Take the case of a person believed to be unattractive to women. He falls madly in love with a woman and decides to confess, while remaining firmly believe that it is not attractive. This conviction led him to limiting access to resources very useful in the end he wants to pursue: it is likely that the person accessing the mood of insecurity and anxiety, the fear of failure, the uncertainty and embarrassment they will act in a clumsy and not very incisive and his actions will produce results that are unlikely to be satisfactory, these results will reinforce the limiting belief, the person will only confirm what is already believed to know - " I was sure I would not be able to win, but unfortunately they are not attractive ... I can not help it, have done so ... "
In fact, a major cause of its failure was its belief that limiting the conditioned from the outset and that, because of its failure, the limit in the future even more evident.

People do not even remotely attempt to grapple with certain things just because they are convinced of not being able to have them: perhaps they have tried two or three times, already convinced that they do not succeed, this belief has produced mediocre results, and after a few attempts failed, they decided not to try again.
How many of us know a person of a certain age who claim to not be brought for the technology and also refuses to learn to use the remote control? Just ask that person how many times he decided to seriously learn to use a technological product. E 'might not have ever tried or, if attempted, it did so in a manner so little use (limited by the belief that "I can also try so I know you do not understand anything ... ") that in the end could not fail: it has strengthened his belief in limiting the extent that also refuses to take a few seconds to figure out how to make a phone call with the phone.

The cycle of success of course also works in reverse for empowering beliefs. Having beliefs that give us the power we have access to resources and appropriate actions that produce positive results that are satisfactory to strengthen our initial convictions.
And the more a belief is as strong as it is difficult to question it, even in the case of a failure.
It 's the case of a person believed to be a great lover who receives a rejection from a woman as his conviction is strong, much less quell'insuccesso will scratch his conviction and this will allow him to continue to access empowering resources whenever that will woo a woman. Of course, if they were to fail repeatedly, his conviction would lose power and would be replaced by a less empowering.

The fundamental concept that I want to transfer with this post is that to do anything in the best way, you must be convinced that they can do it . Our mind can not put the best available resources to follow a path if you have even the slightest doubt that things can go wrong.

In the next post will discover how to identify and change beliefs that limit us. Meanwhile, to understand what is rooted in a belief you can do a very simple experiment: call out the phrase " my name is (name) and I (xx) years . You'll like the way you express yourself and your tone of voice to communicate safety and conviction. Now you aloud other statements which you believe to be more or less convinced that comparing your expression with that obtained when you say your name, you will understand what is rooted that belief in you.

What Is The Lethal Dose Of Tamazepam

our beliefs

The adage habits is one of the many obstacles that we place on the road of change. We are used to "take refuge in the routine" because we need to meet a specific need of our minds: the feel "safe" . Follow paths already known means to avoid exposure to risks. And the lack of risk gives us tranquility and a sense of security that inevitably hamper any inclination to change, unless the remain bound by our habits do not cause a certain amount of pain, in which case we accept the risk to abandon old habits and begin to explore new ways (we will see in the future as the pain associated with a certain status is the mainspring that drives us to change).

But today we are still focused on what limits the change. The term "change" mean the attainment of a status different from the usual, at any level. Change when we overcome the fear that blocks us, when we find the resources needed to achieve a goal, when we learn to shed light on the things we want and we want to achieve when we put order in our set of values \u200b\u200band so on ... Each time we act to achieve a "different state" than the ordinary one, we get a change.

One of the biggest limits to change, which characterizes the mind of every human being, is the need for "consistency" that is, once again, a direct consequence of our basic need for safety.
Just a reflection of a few minutes to understand what we need remain consistent with the principles we believe and how difficult it is to change opinion about something of which we are deeply convinced. People would be able to die in order to remain consistent with their principles and their convictions. The reason is clear: to live in a world so chaotic and heterogeneous, we need strong points of reference. The way we interpret external events, the way we relate to others, as well as all our behavior is based on the strong hinges that can not be challenged easily : if our mind constantly put into question its reference points, we would feel completely disoriented and our lives become virtually unlivable.

Let's take a simple example. Each of us has a set of "beliefs " ie a set of things of which he is deeply convinced .

Take for example a man who is convinced not be attractive to women. This kind of belief might be born after having received "two of spades," or perhaps because the man is "convinced" to be shy and not very interesting. The fact is that this kind of belief is rooted in his mind and has become a fixed point, a pole of reference which determines its existence. The biggest problem is that our mind - as I said - he needed a "exaggerated" to remain consistent with their beliefs. Here is this man, convinced that it is not attractive, just to prove to himself that he had "reason" will implement a series behaviors that will lead him easily to confirm his belief. In the limit could implement some sort of self-sabotage , just to remain consistent with his beliefs.

observes the typical behavior of a man who is not considered attractive. Suppose a woman at a party showing interest in him and this man suggests. The man at first you feel disoriented because they will be faced with an event that is not consistent with his belief. E 'likely that after a while, despite the obvious winks the woman is "convinced" that it is a mistake or misunderstanding. Think: "Probably bewitching smiles have turned to the man who is behind me" (perhaps the person behind him is objectively ugly, but just to remain consistent with his belief, it is "convinced" that it is more attractive than him) . That's the kind of thoughts that could emerge in the minds of our men:
- "probably the woman has an eye twitch and I exchanged for an invitation."
- "probabilmete must be a crazy depressed that satisfied the first that comes to shooting. But in reality it has no interest to me. "
-" that woman is taking the piss out of me. I'm sure my friends have organized a joke. "
- "button is trying to attack me just because I want to present my friend. Is using me as a link ... "

Then maybe his dearest friend comes over and says," but you realize as you see that woman? What are you waiting? . And now our man is even more puzzled because, once again, his conviction is being undermined by doubts. But his "need for consistency" is still there and find one thousand excuses to prove otherwise. And if that woman had to be insistent with their looks, even groped approach, our man will prefer to distance themselves: start to avoid cross eyes, pretend to be gripped by a political discussion, the limit will seek to hide behind a curtain. In other words, will the typical process of "self-sabotage " that aims to prove to himself that things are so , just as he is convinced that . Because there is nothing more "secure" and "reassuring" that said " I know who I am, I know how they are made, and this is how things are going .

What would happen if the man embarrassed the next day he found a woman who say they do not consider attractive: for nothing would be worth the winks the night before. His conviction was not attractive and the event is well-established negative does nothing but further strengthen this belief. By averaging should rationally believe to be attractive to some women and unattractive to others. But these mechanisms are not the domain of reason. Just one negative event to strengthen the conviction limiting, because the need for consistency, the need to say "have done so " is too strong to be challenged by two, three or four events contrary to their conviction.

is that if we want to achieve something and we believe we can not get, then you better not try this: Open the doors to fail and it boosts our belief even more limiting.

Have you ever heard someone say "I'm trying to quit smoking, but I'm not sure to succeed"? And 'he managed to stop smoking? If it was not persuaded to reach the goal, how could he ever get it? Even if he was firmly convinced of succeeding, it is said that we would succeed, why would so many other unpredictable factors could intervene. But imagine if already started with the conviction of failure! His mind would never have allowed her to sacrifice "Need for coherence."

obviously have strong convictions also has a positive value, when of course we mean empowering convictions. So who is believed to be brought to the mathematical calculations may be wrong ten times, but his belief in empowering the lead "so banging his head" on that book that sooner or later will solve the problem ... precisely because they believe themselves to be "good at math and can not deny this conviction.
who is convinced that "knowing how to deal with women" could take up to 10 consecutive poles, but did not resign, and when will be the eleventh time well, he will say to himself: " I knew that I could, because I've always known that I can do with women . The need to confirm his conviction has given him the resources necessary to repeatedly groped and try to change tactics and to tighten things up, to obtain the desired result .

Our belief system may be the source of unlimited power as the cause of dramatic failures . Very strong beliefs are the foundation of all great achievements of humanity. Thomas Edison is said to have failed as many as 10,000 times (!) Before he could invent the light bulb. If he had not according to the absolute conviction of being able to get light through the power would have surrendered at the second attempt. He was convinced to do it and nothing would undermine his conviction (even 10,000 failed attempts!).

The topic today is definitely expanded and developed. Be described techniques to remove limiting beliefs and replace them with empowering convictions. This topic will be the next post.

For the time you do a simple exercise: write on a sheet of paper all the convictions that you feel limiting. Then rewrite all the convictions on each of them putting the phrase "seems to me that . For example if you wrote " are convinced of being a disorderly person ", write on the second sheet " seems to me to be a person inhomogeneous rdinata. Then appends the phrase " really are not so convinced of being . So the final sentence will become " seems to me to be a disorderly person. But in reality are not so convinced of being . Reread what you wrote every day for ten days: you can already see a change of perspective in relation to your current beliefs.

Do Pop Up Trailers Have Licence Plates In Ontario

internal representations

To understand how to change behavior or as a limit or a fear that blocks us is crucial to become aware of as the internal representation of our experiences . For example, what happens in our brains when we feel fear? And what happens inside us when we feel sure of ourselves?

begin to become aware of the fact that we do not know the world objectively, but possess only a "map" subjective of all that surrounds us. In NLP (neurolinguistic programming) it says that " the map is not the territory ", which means that we possess only a simplified representation of the "territory" around us. In fact, our five senses and filter the information coming from outside our brain organizes and interprets them based on models that are different from person to person. Each of us has a different map of that territory.

A glass of wine is not objectively good or bad is good for a sommelier, and can be considered bad to be a teetotaler. "Public speaking is not objectively experience anxiety: for those who love being the center of attention and feel important, on the contrary, a pleasant experience.
concepts seem trivial but they are crucial to understand how to change our relationship against anything that makes us sick, not that we like or that limits us. We are led to believe erroneously that mood connected to an external stimulus (such as "public speaking") is intrinsic to the stimulus itself . So we are convinced that "public speaking" is an experience, "bearer of anxiety" for all without distinction. In other words we are unconsciously inclined to associate the state of mind to the stimulus: it is as if "public speaking" brings with it a state of anxiety. In reality, we associate ourselves with that stimulus a state of anxiety so it would be more correct say that "we are to represent the experience of public speaking anxiety as an experience" rather that "speaking in public is itself anxiety."

Now it is important to understand the way we organize the information within the brain, the way we represent all the information from the outside. Understanding this will enable us to act upon such information and modify them in order to "rewrite" behavior that we consider bad or install "programs" most useful.

For superficial analysis we can affirm that all information contained in our brain can be represented images from from sounds or feelings that have certain characteristics or properties.

For example, try to think of something that makes you fear . What is formed in your brain? Still images or moving? Listen to a voice that tells you something? Please try again in the sensations experienced in the past when you felt really that experience? Review mentally a series of scenes (like a film) of an experience and what brings you in the mood? Now try to concentrate on the characteristics of those images, those sounds or the sensations: see vivid images or blurry? See yourself mode associated (ie like living in first-hand experience ) or dissociated mode (as if you rivedessi outside your person while alive experience)? Images are large or small ? The sounds you hear are strong or weak, distant or neighbors? And from what direction come from? The sensations are intense ?

Each of our behavior, our every belief about anything around us, all our limitations, our every value, every thing we do, we fear, love, hate, desire, esteem, and so on ... is represented in our brain through images, sounds or feelings. Every image, sound or feeling then certain properties (in GNP are called submodalities ). We have already listed some key submodalities: size, position, volume, intensity, etc ... This is the language that is written each of our program. To change it we must first understand what are the representations and their submodalities that distinguish it. Speaking on the latter we can rewrite our programs.

Does Irs Send Audit By Certified Mail?

rewrite the code in our brain software brain

In the previous post we saw how our behavior in response to a series of "brain program" that were "installed" in our brains over the years, from our childhood. The first "programmers" were the parents who were joined by teachers, friends, media. Of course most of all ourselves contribute to our "programming" through internal communication and continual reworking of our experiences.

ports of entry through which all information entering our brain are the five senses. Everything we touch, see, hear is represented and processed by our mind. Everything we do, our actions, the concepts that we express our beliefs, our way of being is a function of how we acquired input information and the way in which we subjectively elaborated.

The process is fairly simple: just born I am in a situation where my brain is completely "virgin" (we might say that is "formatted"). In fact, there are some basic software already installed in our brain, wanting to continue the comparison with the personal computer could say that we, like the PC, we have a BIOS that contains some basic programs (such as those that regulate the basic functions of our body). Over the years, forfeited information through the senses. This enormous amount of information conveniently organized and revised conditions our way of being, that is, our behavior.
E 'own set of information accumulated over the years that allows us to subjectively distinugere the beautiful from the ugly, or guide us in relationship with others, or makes us choose between this or that course of study and so on .. .

So if what we are is because of the way in which we have acquired, developed and organized input information, then to change the way we will be "sufficient" process differently, and re-organize the information we already have within us and those acquired in the future .

We can rewrite a program installed in our brains? Sure! That 's what we do every day. There was a time when we believed in Santa Claus since then some of our program has undoubtedly been rewritten. In most cases we ourselves to rewrite the codes of our programs, as we acquire new knowledge and new experiences.

often interpret change as a route to a clash against our way of being. We believe that change means try at all costs to win our internal resistance , perhaps appealing to our willpower.

Suppose you want to quit smoking. We have a program that encourages us to smoke cigarettes because it makes us associate with a feeling of relaxation and pleasure. Then we have the "willpower" that instead encourages us to pursue our goal even if it means having to suffer. Now every time a person tries to quit smoking puts the two programs against each other , in a sort of imaginary tug of war. The final result depends on which of the two programs is "stronger."
Instead of opposing two aspects of our personality, we may decide to "take" the behavior that we do not like, "open" the code of that program and simply rewrite . So instead of relying on our willpower, we can rewrite our "smoking habit" of pain in order to associate the image of the cigarette and not more than pleasure. We can be conditioned in such a way that gives us the idea of \u200b\u200bsmoking unpleasant feelings. And here is that our process of change will be very easier and more lasting

The goal of future posts will be to illustrate the techniques to rewrite programs (ie, behaviors) that do not like. P hy, instead of having our own behavior as opposed to another characteristic of our personality (the "willpower", usu weaker), we changed our system of internal representations with respect to that particular behavior. Now rewrite the code of our programs is not a rational process (though a prior rational analysis improves the process). Rationally the smoker knows that damage your health and seriously affect the quality of life, yet this rational analysis is not sufficient to change that behavior, to rewrite the code for this program.

The Best Rated Mascara

Many people believe that all the character traits are innate. For example, one can consider shy, introverted, reserved, more suited to reflection and introspection to social life, unwilling to perform manual tasks and more likely to study. And we are deeply convinced to be like that.
However, this way of being leads to suffering perchés felt as a limit: he feels a strong need to deal with others, to socialize and do all sorts of things which are not due to limitations and fears that block us. And when we try to change, to be different, there inevitably comes up against these limits and there is more to repeat phrases like " have done so", " are born shy and introverted and I can not do anything about " " a sheep will never become a lion "and so on ...

these kinds of conditions are a consequence of the type of education we have received and the sociocultural system in which we grew up.
course, if the early childhood ringing in your ears to the voice of a parent repeats " Francis is a good kid and student and does not come out until they have finished their homework " or " Beware of people out there, the world is full of dangers ", or a teacher who tells you" You're a boy too shy ... "or you find yourself with some friends at school who never misses an opportunity to ridicule ... Well, one way or another all of these experiences will shape you . Nor is it said that "subject to this kind of stress" will automatically become a shy and introverted person, maybe you can develop aggression. What is certain is that the kind of experience will have an effect in the development of your personality . In other words I want to show is that what we are today is not due to a series of written information in our DNA. What we are is the result of conditioning, lessons and education that we received over the years and we have revised our brains . The formation of an individual of many factors: parents, teachers, friends, media. Lots of information that are stored and processed by the individual.
If you have an infant delivered to a community of Eskimos, today you would be completely different from what you are.

Then we begin to consider our character, our limitations, our fears, our values \u200b\u200band our virtues not as something that is written in our genes, but as an installed program in our brains . A program that has been codified over the years, from our childhood, and which took root in us.

Think like a personal computer: the brain is the hardware, the physical part you can touch. The way we behave, what we are, is the software installed in our brains.
I have good reason to believe that the "Budget" hardware of each of us is basically the same: there is no reason to believe that a person is genetically more intelligent than another or that it "features brain" best. The difference in all cases makes the software installed in the brain.

The wonderful news is that, as happens with computers, any software installed, you can uninstall , and we can put in place a better one, whether we like it more and make us feel better.

started now to reflect on this concept and to get rid of the belief that "you're so because you were born and thus can not do anything about it. "Every aspect of yourself that you do not like, can be changed .

And I'll tell you that it is not that difficult and it does not take too long either.

1996 Aerolite Dutchman Travel Trailer

TV PRISONERS AND MENTAL

"The real culture is not the accumulation of information via television, in our computers or the Internet. The real culture only exists in the state to question the meaning of life and to serve and the search for values \u200b\u200bthat constitute the meaning of human life on the planet and society. "



of Valerio Pignatta


Statistics tell us that on average we spend watching television between 11 and 14 years of our lives, corrupt accomplices sofas that the "decency" has planted in every home. But thank goodness there are those who in those 14 years ago a lot of other things. Think ... 14 years ... And they say that TV does, however, know the world ... In 14 years if one can know the "real" world, traveling, talking, touching, smelling ... that it is far, I would say that 14 years of segregation in the cell-seated family to "voyeurizzare" the reality of others with the excuse of being a culture.


But unfortunately we got to the point where we confuse junk culture and information. The real culture is not accumulation of information via television, in our computers or the Internet. The true culture exists only on condition that question the meaning of life and to serve and the search for values \u200b\u200bthat constitute the meaning of human life on the planet and society. Here are some thoughts of well-known intellectuals who were interviewed on television and its relationship with human society:


Approval


'[...] is a television transmission system is based on the idea that all human beings are essentially similar [...]. The TV will not recognize the lush diversity of its users. People make thousands of different jobs, have varied hobbies, reading hundreds of thousands of different publications. The TV ignores the reality that human beings are not potatoes, but react to messages and interact.


People have little in common, if not its prurient interest and morbid fears and anxieties. Of course, television, aiming to reach the target at its lowest common denominator gets worse and worse every year. [...] The TV will die because it offends the very nature human tendency toward self-improvement and autonomy "(Gilder, George, Life after television. Big Brother will go the way of the dinosaurs? , Castelvecchi, Rome, 1995, p. 9)


"Basically, the job of TF1 [TeleFrance 1], for example, to help Coca-Cola to sell its product. To make a advertising message is perceived, it is necessary that the brain of the viewer is available . The vocation of our programs is its willingness to create this: If you entertain the viewer, relax and prepare the space between two messages. What we sell to Coca-Cola is a time of human brain available "(as the director of TF1, the leading French television channel, in Le Lay, Patrick, Les Dirigeants face au changement , Les Editions du Jour Huitième, 2004, quoted in Group Marcus of human misery Advertising , Eleuthera, Milano, 2006, p. 35)


"" The world is without gaps, "the city is terribly bored in the country, while the shows on the sea and mountains fill the eyes! Television thus cutting out and rebuilding the real ends up creating a screen between us and the real: "I see, but since there is the screen, the rest away. This becomes an attitude built: what I see on the street is as real as what I saw on the screen.


When I meet a beggar or an unemployed person, the address the same look superficial and disembodied living skeletons that appeal to the Third World that television shows regularly. It's exactly the end of the unreality: the confusion between the real world and the one shown.


Another aspect of the television not only leads to conformity and built by a relentless uniformity, but creates a climate general mental. "When thousands of images in our deep imprint in our ' unconscious', and all carry the same message Basically, this ends up being a crucial component of our behavior and our opinions."


The basic messages are violence and sex. [...] But the public really want these pictures? When I asked, viewers meet that television is "a commodity, a dream, and that does not matter", while admitting that they can not do without it. [...] Here is the main effect of television: kills the vacuum quilting brains (Porquet, Jean-Luc, Jacques Ellul, the man who had planned (almost) everything , Jaca Book, Milan, 2008, pp. 168-170)


Domain


"Nature of the picture tube and the radio frequency spectrum has shaped the power and limitations of television as a medium for information and as a cultural force. These technologies have imposed that television was a top-down (high-low), in electronic architecture, master-slave (master-slave): Many centers in transmission generate programs for millions of passive receivers, or dumb terminals. The scarcity of spectrum forces the television to adopt a centralized system, limited to relatively few channels, with no two-way communication "(Gilder, George, Life after television. Big Brother will go the way of the dinosaurs? , Castelvecchi , Rome, 1995, pp. 27-28)


"Most of the problems in front of which are also the parents do not have to deal directly with the TV itself, but with the control exercised over it . [...] One immediate solution would be ready to hand us, but it seems that many do not have ever thought: turn off the TV. [...] They do not really want to solve the problem. [...] Allow your child to three years to go around with a sharp knife? The permit to cross the street alone? [...] Obviously the child understands when you say one thing firmly "(Winn, Marie, Drugs television , Armando, Rome, 1978, pp. 177-178)


Reality


"Nothing escapes. There is always a camera hidden somewhere. It can be filmed without knowing it. You may be asked to redo everything in front of any television channel. It is believed to exist in the original version, not knowing that this is nothing but a special case of dubbing, a version for the happy few exceptional.


It is at the mercy of a retransmission snapshot of all the facts and all the gestures on any channel. one time we lived this as a police control. Today we regard it as an advertising "(Baudrillard, Jean, The perfect crime. The reality TV killed?, Raffaello Cortina Editore, Milan, 1996, p. 32)


" "Live from reality! Visit this strange world! Treat yourself to the thrill the real world. " [...] The subject of antiques seems to have a real object in contrast with industrial objects, but it is only a foreshadowing of the time when the minimum detectable object will be valuable as a relic of Egypt "(Baudrillard, Jean, Dial M for Murder perfect. The reality TV killed?, Raffaello Cortina Editore, Milan, 1996, p. 49)


"Initially [the image] a fiction built around us: when we move away from the increasingly natural, when we lost contact with reality "that was the substantial reality of our lives," the world of images making us think we still live in a world of ' water, wind, trees and animals. " The number of television shows on exotic animals and unspoiled open spaces will grow to the collapse of biodiversity and the disappearance of virgin spaces (Porquet, Jean-Luc, Jacques Ellul, the man who had predicted ( almost) everything , Jaca Book, Milan, 2008, p. 167)


Culture


"It is true that a picture can be worth a thousand words. But it is even more true that a million images do not give a single concept. Summarized in three points. First, the view is not known. Second, the knowledge can be helped by seeing. Third, the fact remains that to know that for concepts (known in the strong sense) everything unfolds beyond the visible. I'm sorry to see the remote but it is not so "(Sartori, Giovanni, Homo videns, Laterza, Roma-Bari, 1999, p. 149)

by:

http://www.altrogiornale.org / news.php

Odyseey Frame Blueprint

Who is Metatron Cube

2008 is seen by many "as the beginning of a series of events that will radically change every context of our existence." The information in this regard are not many, but January 24, 2008, Corrado Malanga, completed one of his lectures, seems to have given us some more information.
Corrado Malanga But who is?
Prof. Corrado Malanga, a researcher and lecturer in Organic Chemistry at the University of Pisa in 1983, is interested in exploring the field of unidentified flying objects for almost forty years, during which he first organized the search for National UFO Center (CUN) as head of the Technical Committee, continuing his work as founder of the group Stargate Tuscany. It has been a columnist for major magazines News such as UFO, UFO Network, Dossier Aliens, Stargate, Stargate Magazine, Area 51, and the collaboration of two encyclopedic works about UFOs, and has been repeatedly called by the main Italian television network radio to discuss the theme of 'ET'. Among the most significant research carried out by Professor Malanga include studies on the analysis of traces on the ground of alleged UFO phenomenon and studies on the Crop Circle. He is the author of 'The BVM phenomena' (Knopf) with R. Pinotti and 'UFOs in the mind' (Bompiani). His articles can be traced to the web sites and www.ufomachine.org www.sentistoria.org. His current interests are issues related to the alien abduction (abduction), which studies by means of regressive hypnosis and Neuro Linguistic Programming.
To see the video of Prof. Conforent Malanga click on the following link from the website Toltec Culture: http://www.carloscastaneda.it/Corrado-Malanga.htm

Tannning Bed Cover Letter

Corrado Malanga - Sacred Geometry